Lagos Denies Demolishing Obi Brother’s Property, Orders Investigation

Lagos State Government has refuted claims by former presidential candidate Peter Obi that a property belonging to his younger brother was demolished without notice or legal justification, according to a statement signed by Gbenga Omotoso, the State’s Commissioner for Information and Strategy.

Obi had alleged on his official X platform that the property owned by his brother’s company in Ikeja stood for over 15 years before being torn down by unidentified operatives. He described the demolition as “coordinated lawlessness and impunity,” stating there was no demolition order or court judgment naming his brother, no advance notice was given, and no one onsite could identify who ordered the demolition.

He further emphasized: “We waited from 10 am to 2 pm. Nobody called. The contractor said he didn’t know who sent him… The whole situation screamed of coordinated lawlessness and impunity. Our country has become lawless”.

In response, Lagos State in a statement shared on X categorically denied any role in the demolition. Commissioner Omotoso said the Lagos State Building Control Agency (LASBCA) and other government arms were not responsible, affirming that demolitions follow due process.

According to the statement: LASBCA, overseen by Dr. Olajide Abiodun Babatunde, confirmed its non-involvement, A full investigation has been ordered, led by Permanent Secretary Arc. Gbolahan Owodunni Oki, to clarify the situation and determine responsibility.

Omotoso criticized Obi for making public allegations without verifying the facts and warned that the state will not tolerate “acts of lawlessness.” He emphasized that government action must comply with established laws and that individuals found culpable would face legal consequences.

Obi’s younger brother has reportedly filed a lawsuit against the Lagos State Government, seeking redress for the demolition.

This episode follows earlier remarks by advocates like Reno Omokri, who defended the legality of demolitions under certain court judgments targeting “persons unknown,” though critics argue their vague nature may lead to misuse.

As the matter unfolds, court records and the outcomes of the ordered investigation will be pivotal in resolving questions over procedural fairness and accountability.