BREAKING: Why We Arrested VeryDarkMan – EFCC

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has shed light on the arrest of social media influencer Martins Innocent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), stating that it was prompted by multiple petitions alleging financial crimes and his refusal to honour repeated invitations for questioning.

In a statement released by the anti-graft agency on its verified X.com handle, the EFCC emphasized that Otse’s detention follows “grave allegations of financial malfeasance” and that the Commission could not ignore the claims brought against him.

Despite repeated invitations sent to Otse through his known addresses and communication channels, the Commission said he failed to respond, necessitating his arrest.

EFCC clarified that although Otse had previously made unguarded public attacks against the agency, the arrest was solely based on the allegations of financial misconduct and not in retaliation for his criticisms.

“It is needful to admit that the Commission is aware of several unguarded attacks of the suspect against its operations. While such conduct is condemnable, his arrest was not informed by such attacks. The relevant law enforcement agency will be allowed to look into them,” the statement read.

The EFCC further affirmed its legal authority to detain suspects under investigation, adding that a valid Remand Order was obtained in accordance with the law. Otse, the Commission said, has been offered administrative bail and will be released once he meets the bail conditions.

Reiterating its commitment to transparency, the EFCC urged the public to allow it to carry out its duties without interference. “The EFCC should be allowed to do its job without fear or favour. As soon as investigations are concluded, charges will be filed,” the agency noted.

The case has drawn wide public interest and sparked debates across social and mainstream media platforms. EFCC officials say they welcome the scrutiny but caution against baseless insinuations about their motives, maintaining that the ongoing investigation is in line with the Commission’s statutory mandate.